Canadian Safety Reporter

May 2016

Focuses on occupational health and safety issues at a strategic level. Designed for employers, HR managers and OHS professionals, it features news, case studies on best practices and practical tips to ensure the safest possible working environment.

Issue link: http://read.uberflip.com/i/690744

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 7

©2016 Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd ISBN/ISSN: 978-0-7798-2810-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the written permission of the publisher (Carswell, a Thomson Reuters business). Canadian Safety Reporter is part of the Canadian HR Reporter group of publications: • Canadian HR Reporter — www.hrreporter.com • Canadian Occupational Safety magazine — www.cos-mag.com • Canadian Payroll Reporter — www.payroll-reporter.com • Canadian Employment Law Today — www.employmentlawtoday.com • Canadian Labour Reporter — www.labour-reporter.com See carswell.com for information Safety Reporter Canadian www.safetyreporter.com Published 12 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. Subscription rate: $129 per year Customer Service Tel: (416) 609-3800 (Toronto) (800) 387-5164 (outside Toronto) Fax: (416) 298-5106 E-mail: carswell.customerrelations @thomsonreuters.com Website: www.carswell.com One Corporate Plaza 2075 Kennedy Road Toronto, Ontario, Canada M1T 3V4 Director, Carswell Media Karen Lorimer Publisher/Managing Editor Todd Humber Lead Editor Jeffrey R. Smith Assistant Editor Mallory Hendry Contributing Editors Liz Foster Liz Bernier Marketing & Audience Development Manager Robert Symes rob.symes@thomsonreuters.com (416) 649-9551 Circulation Co-ordinator Keith Fulford keith.fulford@thomsonreuters.com (416) 649-9585 CSR | May 2016 | News WEBINARS Interested in learning more about safety and HR issues directly from the experts? Check out the Carswell Professional Development Centre's live and on-demand webinars discussing topics such as building strong safety leadership, engaging managers and supervisors to ensure OHS compliance, and building a better joint health and safety committee. Visit www.cpdcentre.ca/cos for more information. instead gradually progressed over time and led to increasing pain and numbness in the lower back and spreading down to the buttocks and legs. In addition, the worker's pain increased to the point of needing to see his doctor while the worker was laid off and not even working, said the tribu- nal. The tribunal also pointed out that the medical documenta- tion showed the worker's back and leg symptoms remained unchanged from the initial re- porting in May 2012 up to the present — meaning the forklift injury didn't aggravate the con- dition. The tribunal noted that nei- ther the worker's family doctor nor any of the specialists he saw — including a neurosurgeon, neurologist, and internists — felt that there was a link between the worker's condition and the fork- lift injury. "(The worker's family doctor) did not suggest that the worker's symptoms were work related. We also find it significant that there does not appear to be any other medical opinion on file which supports an injury-related cause for the worker's ongoing low back and leg symptoms," said the tribunal. "In our view, the medi- cal record supports a conclusion that the worker's ongoing symp- toms were related to the natural progression of his degenerative disc disease, as evident in the x- ray, CT scan, and MRI reports on file, from 1992 onwards." The tribunal also had a medi- cal discussion paper put togeth- er by orthopaedic surgeons that indicated aging without injury could cause disc problems and there was no consistent evi- dence that a non-traumatic inju- ry could aggravate or accelerate pre-existing aging changes. The tribunal determined that the worker's pre-existing de- generative disc disease was "a symptomatic pre-accident im- pairment" which had been iden- tified and for which the worker was receiving treatment before the forklift accident and injury. As result, there was no entitle- ment to ongoing benefits for the pre-existing condition. As far as entitlement for an aggravation of the worker's condition, the worker already received benefits from Jan. 14 to March 25, 2013, which covered any possible enti- tlement for aggravation from an acute episode such as the forklift incident. The worker's appeal was denied. For more information see: • Decision No. 2512/15, 2015 CarswellOnt 2039 (Ont. W.S.I.A. Trib.). Worker had degenerative disease before injury No benefits < pg. 6 Credit: bikeriderlondon (Shutterstock)

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Safety Reporter - May 2016