Modern Application Development

Determining the total cost of ownership comparing serverless and server-based technologies

Issue link: https://read.uberflip.com/i/1187550

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 1 of 19

2 Adoption of serverless strategies is on the rise. In fact, over 75 percent of organizations surveyed report that they have either implemented a serverless strategy or are planning to do so in the next two years (451 Research). Current customers are also doing more with serverless technologies—AWS users run serverless compute service AWS Lambda 3.5 times more in 2021 than they did in 2019 (Datadog). The popularity of a serverless strategy is growing because it provides the opportunity for faster time to market by dynamically and automatically allocating compute and memory based on user requests. It also provides cost savings through hands-off infrastructure management, which enables organizations to redirect IT budget and development resources from operations to innovation. The pay-for-use model with serverless technologies leads to a shift from large capital expenditure lockup to flexible, on-demand consumption, allowing users to scale, customize, and provision computing resources dynamically to meet their exact needs. This, in turn, increases business agility. But predicting costs in a pay-for-use model can be difficult if the inputs are variable. And prospective customers want to optimize costs by comparing server- or virtual machine–based computing with serverless options. In 2019, we introduced a framework for comparing the total cost of ownership (TCO) for both serverless and server-based applications, factoring in infrastructure, development, and maintenance costs. In that analysis, we concluded that while infrastructure costs may be higher with a serverless approach, the TCO is significantly lower due to savings in development and maintenance costs. Deloitte Industry Insight

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Modern Application Development - Determining the total cost of ownership comparing serverless and server-based technologies