Document

TTI Energy Harvesting Article

Issue link: https://read.uberflip.com/i/1541008

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 1 of 7

2 From Bill of Materials to Total Cost of Ownership LoRa Alliance ® Piles of discarded batteries underscore the hidden costs and waste of battery- powered IoT. In large deployments, frequent battery replacement not only drives up labor and downtime but also contributes to e-waste. Focusing solely on upfront device cost is shortsighted when maintenance can dominate the lifecycle cost[2]. In the early IoT era, project evaluations often centered on minimizing upfront costs – the bill of materials (BOM) for sensors and devices. A battery-powered LoRaWAN sensor might have seemed cheaper than one with a built-in energy harvester or solar panel. However, this BOM-centric view can be misleading. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) – the cumulative cost of buying, deploying, and operating a device over its lifespan – often tells a different story. Maintenance, especially battery replacement labor, logistics, and downtime, constitutes a huge fraction of IoT deployment costs. In large-scale building automation, for example, battery replacement can account for up to 70% of total maintenance costs[1]. Each sensor's battery might need changing every few years, and servicing thousands of devices quickly becomes a massive expense. One analysis showed that for 10,000 wireless sensors, replacing batteries twice over five years (at roughly \$300 per service visit) would cost about \$6 million in maintenance alone[2] – many times the initial hardware cost. Because of these factors, IoT solution providers and customers are shifting their focus from just the device price tag to the average cost per year of operation. An energy- harvesting LoRaWAN device may cost slightly more initially – on the order of 10–30% higher upfront than a battery-only alternative – but it pays for itself through reduced maintenance. In fact, when accounting for labor, travel, replacement batteries, and system downtime, the overall TCO of energy-harvesting devices is significantly lower than that of traditional battery-powered units[3]. Because of this, both IoT solution

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Document - TTI Energy Harvesting Article