CCJ

January 2012

Fleet Management News & Business Info | Commercial Carrier Journal

Issue link: http://read.uberflip.com/i/85081

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 58 of 93

ROLLING THE DICE BY AARON HUFF ACCIDENT-PREVENTION TECHNOLOGIES BRING VISIBILITY, CONTROL driver's fault. Property damage, injuries, legal fees and other incidentals often will exceed the cost for technology that might have prevented the accident. But spending limited capital on technology without a clear timetable for a return on investment can seem like a financial gamble. The investment becomes less risky when considering the T accidents that may happen down the road, such as a tractor collision with a passenger vehicle: 75 percent of large truck fatalities result from collisions with moving vehicles, and 60 percent of fatalities include an initial frontal impact, accord- ing to 2009 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration data. Technologies that can help prevent accidents generally fall into three categories: safety systems that give audible or visual warnings to drivers to increase reaction time; active systems that automatically engage the vehicle brakes when a crash is imminent; and those that capture information about risky driving behaviors. 1. ACTIVE SAFETY All truck manufacturers now offer active safety systems from one or more suppliers such as Meritor Wabco and Bendix. Meritor Wabco offers a stability control system as well as OnGuard, an active radar-based forward-collision safety system that scans the environment and gives drivers a basic warn- ing alert of stationary or slower-moving objects in their path of travel. OnGuard automatically will engage the vehicle's brakes when a collision is imminent regardless of driver activity and whether cruise control is engaged or not. Meritor Wabco is seeing increased demand for integrated safety systems that can provide both active controls and driver alerts. "Our current strategy is to develop things like lane-departure warn- ing systems that allow features such as drowsy driver and video capture to work in conjunction with OnGuard," says Mark Bendix off ers an active electronic stability system and the Bendix Wingman Advanced collision mitiga- tion system. he most minor of accidents involving one of your drivers still can cause great financial pain – even if it wasn't your These fi rst two technologies could have a signifi cant impact on the 81 percent of critical safety events that involve some type of driver distraction, according to a 2009 FMCSA study. They also can increase driver reaction time: A study by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute found that 90 percent of rear-end accidents could be prevent- ed if the driver recognized the situation one second earlier. As for the third technology, a recent analysis from Drive- Cam, a provider of driver risk management systems, com- pared drivers involved in one or more collisions with drivers who have not had a collision. The fi rst group is 6.5 times more likely to exhibit aggressive driving and more than two times as likely to be drowsy or demonstrate judgment error. Technology that can change driving behavior has a high likeli- hood for return on investment. Increasingly, fl eets are looking to maximize return on investment through product integration and by using mul- tiple systems together to manage risk. While each system is different, they all bring real-time visibility and control over situations that otherwise would be left to chance. COMMERCIAL CARRIER JOURNAL | JANUARY 2012 57

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of CCJ - January 2012